Red Management / Our LinkedIn experience
No post images.
Still removed.
In our October 2026 account, we described how our LinkedIn company page disappeared from public view even though we used no images in our posts. This is what we knew and what remained unclear.
Read the article ↗Explore the possibilities ↓
A deliberate decision to use text
Red Management supports professionals in the adult industry with websites, marketing, branding and visual presentation. On LinkedIn, we wanted to explain those services and connect with people who might need them. We deliberately published posts without images to keep the focus on our business and avoid imagery being perceived as offensive. That describes our posts; it does not mean every part of the company profile was free of images.
What we knew, and what we did not
As administrators, we saw a notice saying the page had been removed for violating professional community guidelines. The page remained accessible to administrators, but according to the notice was no longer publicly visible. The notice did not identify the specific text, profile element or activity responsible. We did not know whether a person or an automated system had made the decision. A general reference to guidelines did not answer those questions.
Professionalism is about the work
Our clients ask about their websites, visibility, privacy and business presentation. Those are business questions even when the work takes place in the adult industry. We believe sex workers, OnlyFans creators, strippers and other professionals deserve access to knowledgeable support, with respect for their independence and boundaries. Someone’s industry does not, by itself, tell you how carefully they run their business.
Was our audience the reason?
It is a question we naturally ask. However, we had no specific explanation establishing that our audience caused the removal. It would be careless to present that suspicion as a fact. What we could describe was our experience: we considered the platform, published without post images and then received no specific explanation. We wanted to know which content failed to meet the rules and why, so that we could respond or make a targeted change.
Why our own website matters
The experience reinforced our decision not to build our entire online presence on social platforms. A company page can disappear while demand for the work remains. On our own website we can explain what we do, who we work with and why discretion, choice and respectful treatment matter to us. We remain reachable here by clients and collaborators. This article records the experience described in October 2026; it is not a claim about the page’s current status.
Explore websites & marketing ↗Originally published in Dutch on 1 October 2026. English adaptation prepared in November 2026. The generated editorial images are illustrations, not documentary evidence of the events described. Read the original in Dutch ↗